Categories
gaslighting truth Uncategorized

Tucker Carlson interviews Big Pharma whistleblowers

Tucker Carlson interviews Big Pharma whistleblowers in this recent and stunning entry. This is one of the most important interviews you will ever watch.

Buckle yourself in for an engrossing two hours from two passionate American siblings exposing the business model of the pharmaceutical industry. What is that business model? Believe it or not, it’s keeping its consumers sick and drugged for life.

Casey Means and Calley Means

The interview reveals this process begins from the moment babies are born. No surprise, since pharmaceutical companies are the largest contributors to the American Academy of Pediatrics , the American Medical Association and the major medical schools.

And get this, did you know the processed food industry is operated mostly by cigarette companies? I didn’t, and that is just one of the incredible revelations of this interview with Calley and Casey Means.

Casey was a Stanford-educated surgeon and Calley, her brother , was a lobbyist for Big Pharma and the food industry. Both gave up prestigious careers to awaken Americans to the disturbing realities of the drugs they take and the food they eat . Watch:

This interview is illustrative of a gradual spiritual change, I believe, happening in America. Old paradigms are collapsing .

Information is trickling out that is gobsmacking people out of their fog of entrusting their lives and well-being to formerly esteemed institutions.We still have a long way to go, but a shift is occurring.

There is the only one pill Big Pharma wants you to refuse: the red pill.

Categories
Uncategorized

Appeals court rules mRNA shots are not vaccines?

Covid-19 mRNA shots are not vaccines? A ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals answers that question with a hard yes.

Yes, that Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. I will explain what I mean about that observation in a bit.

For now, this ruling is huge. Why? This could strip pharmaceutical companies of legal liability protection. Put simply, the ruling could set the stage for lawsuits against the mRNA shot manufacturers.

The Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) triggered this ruling with its lawsuit against the Los Angeles Unified School District . What was the nature of the lawsuit? No , it could’t be the mandates. Oh wait, that was the reason!

You know the schtick:” Nice job you have here. Would be a shame if something happened to it because you didn’t get vaccinated.”

Turns out “vaccine” is the wrong terminology for the shots, according to the court. While marketed to the public as vaccines, the court ruled the shots do not effectively stop the transmission of Covid-19. While they may reduce symptoms in the affected, that’s not enough to make the shots, traditional vaccines.

What is a vaccine? The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905) that vaccinations prevent the spread of diseases like smallpox, not reduce the symptoms in the infected.

The ruling reverses a lower court’s dismissal of the case against LAUSD’s vaccine mandate. LAUSD’S policy was , of course, buoyed by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) changing the definition of a vaccine in 2021, from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to specific disease,” to ” a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

The press may have never questioned the semantics games of the CDC with any intensity , but the Ninth Circuit certainly did. Amazing, when you consider conservative critics used to label this appellate jurisdiction the “Ninth Circus Court of Appeals “due to the volume of overturned rulings . Some legal experts are confident this ruling will stand.

For deeper dives into the ruling check those out here and here.You can read the ruling in its entirety, at this link .

Categories
Uncategorized

FDA settles in major lawsuit over Ivermectin

Remember the FDA demanding censorship of doctors for “misinformation” regarding the efficacy of Ivermectin as a Covid treatment in 2020? Flash forward four years, now the FDA settles in major lawsuit over Ivermectin.

The late Clayland Bowden Gray and the Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) initiated the lawsuit. Although the FDA admits no wrongdoing, settling out of court usually indicates no confidence in winning the case.

The FDA must now remove every piece of published and/or posted advice against the use of Ivermectin to combat Covid. Yeah, the propaganda which gave a frightened public no other treatment options except for the jab.

Demonizing other treatments allowed the FDA to distribute the shots under Emergency Use Authorization. EUA is only granted when no other viable treatment options exist.

Remember FDA reports and tweets ridiculing Ivermectin as a horse dewormer and alarming people of its toxicity? Think back also to the propaganda-media and late-night talk show hosts backing the FDA.

In his sub-stack titled,”The FDA Settled With Us Because They Knew They Were Going To Lose”, Dr. Pierre Kory gives the backstory of the lawsuit . Here’s an excerpt:

In my book, The War on Ivermectin, Chapter 33 is called “The Horse Dewormer PR Campaign.” I invite you to see this previous post where I detail the campaign’s highly coordinated and sequentially timed actions between the FDA, CDC, AMA, APHA and corporate controlled media (i.e. late night hosts, news broadcasts, newspapers etc). Clearly, the goal of the campaign was to convince the public that ivermectin was a dangerous and ineffective horse dewormer.

In the wake of that campaign, pharmacies stopped filling valid, legal prescriptions and hospitals removed ivermectin from their formularies. Never had an FDA approved drug, one of the (if not the) safest prescribed medications in history ever been vilified or restricted to this extent. Just like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin had to be stopped.

Ivermectin has been an effective anti-parasite and anti-viral drug since its discovery in 1975. In 2015, the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine, honored the discovery of Ivermectin.

I encourage you to read Dr. Kory’s entire piece here. It’s a deep dive, but highly informative.