Categories
Uncategorized

On influencers

Influencer is a word I’ve come to notice and dislike instantly. When you hear the term social media influencer, doesn’t it sound Orwellian? As if someone is openly admitting they are there to shape how you think.

Speaker connecting with audience symbolizing unified consciousness and one voice
A speaker connects minds with an audience symbolizing unified consciousness and collective voice.

As Americans, we should be bothered by that. Hell, it should piss us off.

There are influencers across the political spectrum, but for this piece, let’s focus on the so-called conservative influencers.

What I’m about to say may irritate some people, but many conservatives became vulnerable to influencers because we spent years being vilified by the media and mainstream culture. We were labeled racists, sexists, bigots, and homophobes simply for holding views that, not long ago, were considered normal American opinions.

As a result, conservatives became eager to rally around anyone who sounded like they were finally articulating what we were thinking. The moment someone appeared intelligent, confident, and willing to fight back, we granted them credibility almost automatically. We quoted their podcasts, shared their clips, and repeated their talking points in conversations as if they were gospel.

Over time, I realized that many of these figures were not truly leading a movement. They were managing an audience.

Some of these influencers say just enough to keep people emotionally invested while steering them away from meaningful action. They keep the audience angry, engaged, and constantly consuming content, but rarely move beyond that. It’s like slowly releasing steam from a pressure cooker just to make sure it never explodes.

People start believing they are fighting for the country after spending hours listening to podcasts, watching clips, reposting commentary, and arguing online. But consuming political content is not the same as political action. At some point, outrage becomes entertainment.

In recent months, many people began noticing cracks in the façade as several prominent conservative figures started turning against President Trump and attempting to fracture MAGA support. You know the names: Candace Owens, Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Megan Kelly, Ben Shapiro, and others.

Clockwise from left to right: Candance Owens, Megan Kelly, Tucker Carlson, Ben Shapiro, Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones

Carlson especially stands out to me.

I remember telling friends around 2020 that something about Tucker didn’t sit right with me. This was in the aftermath of the 2020 election, when millions of Americans were questioning the integrity of the vote. Whether or not people agreed with those concerns, I felt Carlson seemed unusually eager to move on from the subject and redirect attention elsewhere.

At the time, I even submitted a piece to a mainstream conservative website questioning Tucker’s loyalty. Apparently, the article struck a nerve, and the site’s head published a counterpiece alongside mine.
Not going to lie, I started second-guessing myself afterward. I wondered whether I had unfairly criticized the guy or misread the situation entirely.

Then Fox News fired Tucker, and for a while I thought maybe I had been wrong. Some of his independent work was genuinely solid. I even wrote publicly that I might have misjudged him.
But his recent attempts to divide MAGA only reinforced my original instinct.

And that’s the main point of this article.

If your gut tells you something about a public figure feels off, don’t ignore it just because that person is popular, polished, or constantly praised online. You do not owe blind loyalty to influencers, commentators, or political celebrities.

The word influencer itself should make Americans uncomfortable.

We are descendants of people who rebelled against kings, crossed oceans, fought wars, built businesses, raised families, and carved a nation from the wilderness because they refused to be controlled. Americans were never meant to sit around waiting for internet personalities to tell them what to think.

Despite all the propaganda meant to convince us otherwise, we are not helpless, weak, or stupid.

Trust your instincts. Think for yourself. And take everything influencers tell you with a grain of salt.

Hand holding a pinch of salt close-up
Categories
Uncategorized

Why is Tucker Carlson suddenly MAGA enemy #1?


Why is Tucker Carlson suddenly MAGA enemy #1? It’s because Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin say so.

Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro


According to these two, Carlson is an antisemitic because of three unforgiveable reasons: 1) He dared to question foreign aid to Israel and our involvement in their wars, 2) at the Charlie Kirk funeral, he compared Kirk’s assassination to that of the Pharisees’ call for killing Jesus, and 3) Tucker committed the unforgiveable sin of giving an honest interview to Nick Fuentes. They want Tucker canceled, humiliated, and ruined.

Tucker Carlson (L), interviewing Nick Fuentes (R)

So, let’s get this straight: questioning US foreign aid, quoting Scripture, and practicing free speech means you are evil incarnate? That’s what Levin, Shapiro, and much of the conservative elite are decreeing.

My question is, who made them the arbiters of Make America Great Again? Oh, that’s right, themselves. Funny, how these MAGA purists hated Donald Trump when he first ran for President in 2016. They angrily declared Trump was a threat to conservatism in the same panicked tones currently calling for Tucker’s career demise.


During his radio program in 2016, Levin ranted about Trump being an existential threat to the conservative movement. It reached the point where Levin’s show ratings plummeted. I used to listen to Levin when I was a neophyte conservative. His unhinged rantings about Bad Orange Man removed the scales from my eyes. I also used to listen to Shapiro. However, I stopped when he suggested that Trump losing to Hillary Clinton in 2016 would strengthen conservatism.

So now these former Trump haters are dictating what we can question. They are deciding who we shouldn’t listen to. They are also telling us what we should believe. Historically, those advocating for cancel culture have sought to limit people’s exposure to specific information. They fear such revelations may threaten their narrative and/or agenda. That’s true on both the so-called right and the left.

This united cadre of cancel culture is creeped out by the possibility that the words of hated individuals may resonate. They worry that these opinions might click with the masses. Remember this the next time you hear someone labeled as a bigot, racist, Uncle Tom, sexist, homophobe, or anti-Semite. Consider who is doing the shouting. The media, politicians, and academia do this en masse.

Why is Tucker Carlson MAGA enemy #1? He’s doing his part to help people make up their own minds, rather than allowing gatekeepers to hold sway over them. With the assassination of Charlie Kirk, there is a leadership void. A national figure is missing, one who appeals to the hearts and minds of young men. The conservative elite fears Fuentes taking up that mantle.

Do I agree with everything Nick Fuentes, Alex Jones, or even Tucker Carlson say? No, of course not. Let me also say that at one time, I thought Tucker was controlled opposition and did not trust him. My opinion has since changed, and I regard Mr. Carlson as a true patriot.

However, I reserve the right as an American to choose whether or not to listen to what these men say. Shutting them down and throwing the Nazi word around, with reckless abandon, is undoubtedly not MAGA.

Are Fuentes and Carlson as evil as Shapiro and Levin claim? If they are, why not simply debate them? Such an exchange would challenge and expose their supposedly dangerous ideas for all to see. Perhaps Shapiro and Levin have not announced such an event because they fear losing the argument. They might believe the public will not side with them.

That’s the beauty of freedom of speech– exposure to ideas you can either accept or reject. This truth is something the conservative elite has chosen to ignore and wants Americans to forget.

Categories
Uncategorized

Ron Paul was right

In the latest Tucker Carlson interview , we learn that Ron Paul not only presaged our current economic woes, he also rightly called out the miasma that is Ukraine.

You can watch the full interview on tuckercarlson.com. I have to say that knowing what I know now, I wish I would have voted for Dr. Paul in 1988, 2008 and 2012.

If I could have a do-over, I would have also voted for Pat Buchanan for President of the US in 1996 and 2000, and Tom McClintock for California Governor in 2003, over Arnold Schwarzeneggar.

I will expound on these regrets in a future column

Categories
Uncategorized

Tucker Carlson :What is path for U.S. after Israel terrorist attack?

What impresses me the most about Tucker Carlson are the insightful questions he asks that many of us aren’t thinking about. In this commentary, he puts the brakes on the emotional reaction most of us have had in the aftermath of the Hamas terrorist attack against Israel. Carlson also shines the light on the warmongers banging the war drums and interviews a Presidential candidate who has a more measured take on what the American response should be.

Courtesy X

I hate to say it , but whatever any RINO warmonger is for , I’m going to be against. Tucker’s report helped me to remember that. What say you?

Presidential candidate,Nikki Haley
Categories
Uncategorized

I guess Tucker wasn’t controlled opposition

I was stunned by Tucker Carlson’s departure from Fox News. I must admit that ,up to that moment, I thought the network used him as controlled opposition to keep up the facade of conservative street cred.

I have to rethink that.

For Fox to ditch Carlson’s top rated program, a money-maker for the station, is a head scratcher. News reports have speculated that Fox fired Carlson as part of Fox News’ recent nearly 800 million dollar settlement with Dominion Voting Systems. Fox settled over charges the voting machine company of rigged the election against former President Donald Trump in 2020.

Just a little aside. Fox played a huge role in rigging the 2020 election against Trump by calling Arizona for Joe Biden before polls closed. Remember they called Arizona before calling Texas for Trump.. Trump lost Arizona by only 11 thousand votes. I agree with some pundits that Fox “took a dive” and would have won the lawsuit on appeal.

I believe the Dominion settlement is a plan to give the voting machine company the imprimatur of honesty. In other words, it makes the company symbolically ironclad against accusation of election manipulation.

The settlement is a huge but merely a pittance to a multi-billionaire like Rupert Murdoch. And if it weakens Trump’s election efforts in 2024 , then it was money well spent.

Anyway, back to Tucker.

It probably didn’t help Tucker when he recently interviewed President Trump, giving the likely Republican 2024 nominee a positive forum. Up to that point, Trump was persona non grata at Fox News. Their efforts to prop up Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and every other Republican presidential candidate, except Trump, did not go unnoticed.

I stopped watching Fox News right after the 2020 Presidential Election fiasco but I would watch Carlson on clips presented by conservative sites . I thought his recent commentaries on Big Pharma/Pfizer and J6 were pretty hard hitting . . Btw Fox ,when are we going to see the rest of the J6 footage? Not holding my breath.

Carlson will land on his feet and wherever and however he returns, the ratings will be off the charts. We’ll see if Fox will continue the purge of base friendly conservative hosts like Jesse Watters .

Regardless , Fox appears to be on a leftward beeline.