California voters have 14 statewide measures on the November 3 ballot.Vote ”’no” to more blank checks and “yes” to real accountability.
I’ve reviewed the official summaries, the Legislative Analyst’s reports, and both sides of the arguments. Here’s my take so your eyes won’t glaze over when deciding these propositions.

One principle guides several of my no votes. With the Democrats dominating the Legislature for years, it’s insane to hand over another temporary tax hike or bond measure. Temporary almost never stays temporary in Sacramento, and the record of spending taxpayer money carefully or effectively is weak. Stop writing blank checks.
The propositions at a glance
Prop 1: $11.25 billion housing bond, mostly for affordable rentals and some veteran loans. Large borrowing to be repaid over decades from the General Fund.
Prop 2: Doubles the rainy-day fund cap from 10% to 20% and changes the Gann limit rules.
Prop 3: Makes the higher income-tax rates on top earners permanent (currently set to expire in 2031). Funds mainly for schools.
Prop 4: Allows public financing of campaigns at the state and local levels.
Prop 5: Changes the recall process so that there is no simultaneous successor election when a statewide officer is recalled.
Prop 37: Creates a second-mortgage program for middle-income buyers of new homes, backed by up to $25 billion in bonds that borrowers repay.
Prop 38: $8.4 billion bond for immunology and immunotherapy research, with a large share directed to a specific institute.
Prop 39: Requires government-issued ID to vote in person (or the last four digits on mail ballots), plus free state voter ID cards and improved citizenship verification reporting. (Ballotpedia)
Prop 40: A one-time 5% wealth tax on people and trusts with more than $1 billion in covered assets, mostly for healthcare.
Prop 41: Requires audits of programs funded by new special taxes and blocks new taxes that try to circumvent the Gann spending limit. Direct conflict with Prop 40.
Prop 42: Bans new state taxes on retirement savings, personal assets, and similar holdings after January 1, 2026. It also conflicts with Prop 40.
Prop 43: Restores the two-thirds voter threshold for local special taxes (earmarked taxes) and closes the simple-majority loophole for citizen initiatives.
Prop 44: Requires federally qualified health clinics to spend at least 90% of revenue on “program services,” with penalties for falling short.
Prop 45: Speeds up CEQA review for essential projects (housing, water, transportation, clean energy, and more) by setting clear deadlines and tightening lawsuit rules. CEQA is the California Environmental Quality Act, the 1970 state law that requires detailed environmental studies and can lead to lengthy lawsuits before many projects can move forward. (Official CEQA overview; LAO analysis of Prop 45)Full list of qualified measures: California Secretary of State. Overall ballot overview: Ballotpedia 2026 propositions.
Why you should vote No on Props 1 through 5
These measures expand spending power, lock in higher taxes, or weaken accountability. California already carries heavy debt and continues to face budget pressure. Another multi-billion-dollar housing bond, a larger rainy-day fund that simply enables more spending, permanent high-income tax rates, taxpayer-funded campaigns, and a softer recall process all move in the wrong direction. Vote no on each of them. Sacramento has shown it cannot be trusted with blank checks.
Why you should vote No on 37, 38,40 and 44
Prop 37 further complicates housing finance without fixing the real supply problems. Prop 38 piles on more debt for research that already receives substantial public and private funding; the heavy earmark is hard to justify. Prop 40 is a one-time wealth tax that looks appealing on paper but risks more capital flight and legal challenges. It is not a serious long-term solution. Prop 44’s rigid 90% spending rule for safety-net could force clinics to cut necessary work.
Vote Yes on 39,41-43 and 45
Prop 39 is basic election integrity: show ID, and the state will provide a free card if needed. Props 41 and 42 put real guardrails in place: audits for transparency and clear limits on taxing personal savings or evading the spending cap. They matter especially as checks against Prop 40.
Prop 43 restores the traditional two-thirds requirement for local special taxes, so a bare majority cannot lock in tax hikes. Prop 45 is the practical reform California needs. It keeps environmental review but sets real timelines so housing and infrastructure can actually be built.
The bottom line
No on 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 37, 38, 40, and 44.
Yes on 39, 41, 42, 43, and 45.
These votes favor holding the line on spending, strengthening election rules, protecting local taxpayers, and reforms that help the state deliver results rather than more process. When Sacramento keeps asking for more money while mismanaging what it already has, the answer should be simple: no more blank checks.
Read the official Voter Information Guide and the Legislative Analyst’s Office analyses before you vote. These are my takes, based on the facts.
Make your own call. On California’s 2026 ballot, the path is straightforward: no more blank checks, yes to real accountability.















