A reader sent me this post from the YouTube channel, Doug in Exile. The host not only recounts the willful lies of the media against Donald Trump’s blood bath comment, he also presents a media montage of their own cliched use of the world. And now… a “bloodbath” chorus.
TRUMP IS A GENIUS:
he trolls legacy media for how many times they used the word “bloodbath”, but when he used it ONCE, they attack him! See video!
LOL. I rarely watch the propaganda media, so I had no idea bloodbath was such an overused cliche. Such montages always illustrate the hive mentality of the propaganda- media and the Democrats.
It really is comical and at the same time, educational. No reporter or anchorperson has an original thought or voice. They wear their bias on their foreheads , reciting the same headlines in the same way.
You’ve probably seen the fake news “bloodbath” attribution to President Trump as the latest threat to “democracy”. It’s a hoax.
During a speech to the Buckeye Values PAC Rally in Dayton, Ohio, Trump informed the capacity crowd of China’s plans to build massive EV plants in Mexico. Such an investment indicates the Chinese believe the US Government will force the existence of the EV market, despite the public reception of the vehicles, cooling. China’s dominance would destroy the U.S. EV market.
Here’s Trump’s comment:
Trump said it will be a bloodbath for the auto industry if he is not re-elected and is right. However, the media willfully lied about the context of Trump’s comment, twisting it into a threat against “democracy” if he doesn’t win in November.
Check out these hoax headlines: (Hat tip: The Conservative Treehouse)
And right on cue a “grieved” Nancy Pelosi:
Pelosi just told CNN that Trump might "exact a bloodbath" if he loses
Pelosi and the media think the American people are stupid. More people are coming out of their stupor and seeing this as the dirty, disgusting hoax that it is.
Truth and objectivity? What a laugh. This is going to backfire big time. The only truth is the media is fake news.
Intellectual Froglegs: “Orange Crush”, the latest installment from patriot Joe Dan Gorman. My only gripe about this site is I wish I could post these shows weekly. That’s how good they are.
This episode spotlights the irony that the worst RINO’s ( Republicans In Name Only) represent reds states. He also features an exclusive interview with Dr. Naomi Wolf.
Former President Donald Trump calls for GOP unity after amazing Super Tuesday victories. Trump ran the table, winning every state primary except Vermont.
Trump spoke to supporters at Mar-A-Lago where he called President Joe Biden the worst leader this country has ever had:
Courtesy:Forbes
Nikki Haley won her second primary in Vermont after winning Washington D.C. last week. Rejecting Trump’s calls for unity, Haley says she is not dropping out of the presidential race.
“Unity is not achieved by simply claiming ‘we’re united,'” she continued, an apparent reference to calls from Donald Trump and his allies for the party to join in support of him. “Today, in state after state, there remains a large block of Republican primary voters who are expressing deep concerns about Donald Trump. That is not the unity our party needs for success. Addressing those voters’ concerns will make the Republican Party and America better.”
In other primary news, baseball legend Steve “Mr. Clean”Garvey (R) will face Adam “Pencil-neck” Schiff (D) in a November runoff for the US Senatorial race in California. A jubilant Garvey bid supporters to welcome California’s comeback.
In the biggest upset of the evening, Maryland entrepreneur Jason Palmer beat President Joe Biden in the Democrat primary in American Samoa. Palmer won 51 of the 90 votes cast. Not a huge turnout, but hey, a win is a win.
Trump’s momentum took on the aspects of a bullet-train this week. This, after the Supreme Court smacked down Colorado’s 14th amendment ruling. The ruling effectively stopped the efforts of other states like Illinois and Maine from removing the 45th President from the ballot.
In an historic, unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) smacks down Colorado’s attempt to remove President Donald Trump from the ballot due to the 14th Amendment. This 9-0 ruling effectively stops the efforts of other states to do the same.
Here’s the media reaction. First, from Fox:
CNN:
BBC:
and finally, NBC.
This is a major victory for President Trump and for America. Praise the Lord!
Lots of speculation over President Donald Trump’s VP choice. Whoever Mr. Trump picks, it must be a Washington D.C. outsider.
Why must Trump bring in someone independent of the Washington establishment? Something taints people after spending enough time in D.C. Even those considered strong conservatives should be viewed with a jaded eye.
Pundits are pushing Congresswoman Elise Stefanik or Senator Tim Scott as solid VP choices. I disagree wholeheartedly.
Rep. Elise Stefanik
While a principled legislator and a defender of President Trump during the Russia – Russia hoax, Stefanik is a member of Congress. This means she makes her living compromising for the best legislation. After all, isn’t that the nature of politics: giving something to get something?
Senator Tim Scott
The same goes for Senator Scott. He seems to be a decent guy, and has defended Trump on numerous occasions, but despite his Christian-conservative bona fides, he’s still an insider.
Yes, I understand the executive branch has to sometimes compromise with the House and Senate. And yes, I understand sometimes “inside baseball “knowledge is needed to get things done.
HOWEVER …
In the times we are living, any compromise with Congress must mean them coming to the people’s side, as represented by Trump, rather than the other way around. This means Washington insiders are the last thing needed due to their exposure to the D.C. virus.
What is the D.C. virus? I call it a contagion that taints politicians’ view of the people, weakens their spines, and grafts them into the hive mentality of doublespeak, fence-sitting and taking “principled” stands only when election time rolls around.
Because of this virus, every soundbite or vote a legislator makes becomes a political calculation. Standing strong on a matter usually comes after wetting that finger and figuring out which way the political winds are blowing. Are there exceptions to this? Of course, and I think Ms. Stefanik is probably one of those exceptions; perhaps even more so than Mr. Scott, in my humble opinion.
BUT…
Non-politicians must step up to fix Washington: ordinary men and women who view the current system with disgust and believe the needs of the American people ( not lobbyists) should take prominence in every piece of legislation.
Key traits needed? They must be unflappable independent thinkers.
This must apply to those running for congressional office and for Trump’s Vice President choice. When it comes to the VP, only one person fits this description: Dr. Ben Carson.
Dr. Ben Carson
Carson is not a politician, but a former neurosurgeon. Why is this important? Neurosurgeons are at the top-tier of the surgical hierarchy.
Neurosurgeons perform precise and delicate procedures involving the brain and the spinal cord. We’re talking high stakes with the risk of maximum harm. If you compare surgeons to military special forces, then neurosurgeons are the Navy Seals of the medical profession.
With this in mind, consider that Carson was the best-of-the-best of neurosurgeons. At 33 years old, Carson was the youngest head of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital. He gained national attention in 1987 when he and his team performed the first separation of infant conjoined twins. You can read about that here and here.
If that’s not enough to prove Carson is no empty suit, consider his life story: parents divorcing when he was young, growing up in a single parent home, living in poverty, having a violent temper and thought of as dumb by elementary school classmates. He was blessed to have a strong mother who taught him and his brother the value of reading. His Christian faith overcame his past, making him the brilliant surgeon and walk-the walk conservative he is today.
What sets Carson apart is his fearlessness to speak truths no matter who is offended. This was on full display during his 2013 National Prayer Breakfast speech with President Barack Obama in attendance. Carson’s speech stood out because it was antithetical to Obama’s divisive policies of fundamentally transforming America.
Making America great again means looking to the talents, wisdom, humility and patriotism of successful Americans. These are the people we need in political office, not professional politicians.
As Secretary of Housing and Urban Development in Trump’s last administration, Carson got an up-close and personal of D.C. dealings. Some may say that makes him an insider.
No way.
Although Carson headed HUD, he didn’t have to worry about re-election or towing the party line. He made executive decisions, independent of legislative bodies.
Trump needs a loyal wingman who could later take the baton as his successor and pass it along responsibly. Carson most certainly fits the bill for Trump’s VP choice.
President Donald Trump wins the Iowa Caucus…. by landslide As of this writing Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley are battling for second place: a very distant second place.
Trump won 98 of 99 counties in Iowa in the first vote of the 2024 Presidential campaign; not only crushing the competition, but causing Vivek Ramaswamy to suspend his campaign. Ramaswamy will throw his support behind Trump.
President Trump spoke to the crowd after the victory:
The question now is with Trump’s margin of victory, why is there even a race for second place? Wouldn’t it make sense for the candidates and the Republican National Committee to consolidate resources behind the obvious frontrunner? These are questions the voters are asking and the RNC is pretending to ignore.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) agreed on Friday to take up the Colorado case to remove President Donald Trump off the ballot due to the 14th Amendment. The court’s decision will have lasting ramifications in future efforts by the Democrats to keep the 45th President off of other state ballots.
The Colorado Supreme Court ‘removed’ Trump from the ballot in December for ‘inciting’ the January 6 ‘insurrection’ under the 14th Amendment. Critics of the Colorado court say the ruling is nothing more than election interference since Trump was never convicted for insurrection. More on that later.
Here is what insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment explicitly states:
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
As you can see from the language, the 14th Amendment applies to congresspersons, officers of the United States government, state assemblypersons, governors or judges. Nowhere is the President mentioned. Legal scholars say the 14th Amendment does not apply to the President because he is not an officer of the government and, in this case, was never found guilty of insurrection for the January 6 protest /riot.
If Trump was never found liable for inciting insurrection, then the legal basis from removing him from the ballot is questionable. You can’t penalize someone for an accusation without a conviction as Colorado, and later, Maine did. That makes a mockery of the law.
Arguments to SCOTUS will start on February 8 with a ruling following. Trump remains on both ballots pending litigation, in the meantime.
Please note the Colorado ruling was without teeth, playing both sides by allowing Trump back on the ballot as soon as he appealed to the Supreme Court. See this brilliant analysis by Sundance at the Conservative Treehouse.
President Trump has released a long-awaited report of widespread voter in key swing states. You may not have heard about this because of the release of the Jeffrey Epstein legal documents dumped at the same time. I’m sure the timing of the salacious Epstein release was probably a coincidence (insert eye roll here).
Here are some excerpts from the eye-opening report:
GEORGIA
• Georgia was called by 11,779 votes. • Fulton County, Georgia, the most populous county in the state, has no digital record of all in person votes cast in its original results.
• Not a single ballot purportedly cast during early in-person voting was witnessed to and signed off by poll managers, as required by Georgia election rules. Seals were broken and memory cards removed from tabulators for the results of these 315,000 votes, which were printed out on different machines than the ones that tabulated them. This prevented the reconciliation of how many votes were cast on each machine.
• The ballot images of these votes, along with the rest of in-person ballots cast on Election Day, were destroyed.
• The vote in Georgia was counted three times: the original machine count, a statewide hand recount, and a second machine count. Each time the state, and Fulton County, reported three different results.
• Fulton County did not count the same ballots during the original count and the machine recount. There are 19,541 distinct ballots that appear in one machine count but not the other. • Thousands of fraudulent “presidential only” ballots were injected into the second machine count, with huge margins favoring Joe Biden. Ballots that are blank except for the presidential contest were counted in batches together, with the pattern appearing in at least eight counties, including Fulton. This means Georgia did not have the votes to justify its original Election “results.”
WISCONSIN
• Wisconsin was called by 20,682 votes.
• The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin law, in a 4-3 decision issued in July 2022.
• Wisconsin Election Commissioner Meagan Wolfe unilaterally declared ballot drop boxes could be used to vote in 2020 elections, even though “WEC’s commissioners never voted to adopt this memo.”
• Ahead of the November 2020 Election, Wolfe encouraged clerks to use “creative solutions” to deploy drop boxes, that she said could be “unstaffed.” There were 528 drop boxes used in the General Election, and a total of 1,969,274 absentee votes cast, including 1,346,731 votes cast by mail, and 653,236 in-person.
• In a concurring opinion to the ruling finding drop boxes to be unlawful, Justice Rebecca Bradley writes, “If the right to vote is to have any meaning at all, elections must be conducted according to law. Throughout history, tyrants have claimed electoral victory via elections conducted in violation of governing law… in Wisconsin elected officials “deriv[e] their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
• “The right to vote presupposes the rule of law governs elections. If elections are conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the government. Such elections are unlawful and their results are illegitimate.”
• Justice Bradley concluded “thousands of votes have been cast via this unlawful method,” using drop boxes, “thereby directly harming the Wisconsin voters.”
• “The illegality of these drop boxes weakens the people’s faith that the election produced an outcome reflective of their will,” Justice Bradley writes. “The Wisconsin voters, and all lawful voters, are injured when the institution charged with administering Wisconsin elections does not follow the law, leaving the results in question…Electoral outcomes obtained by unlawful procedures corrupt the institution of voting, degrading the very foundation of free government. Unlawful votes do not dilute lawful votes so much as they pollute them, which in turn pollutes the integrity of the results.”
PENNSYLVANIA
• Pennsylvania was called by 80,555 votes.
• Months after the election, there were 121,240 more votes than voters, according to the Pennsylvania Department of State. By law, Pennsylvania cannot certify an election with this type of discrepancy.
• Republican lawmakers, led by State Representative Frank Ryan, were tracking the vote discrepancy in real time in the Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE) system. Ryan, a certified public accountant, initially reported that there were 170,830 more votes than voters in the Presidential race, more than twice the margin in Pennsylvania. “These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error,” the lawmakers said.
• The Pennsylvania Department of State’s office called this “obvious misinformation,” while admitting the “only way to determine the number of voters who voted in November from the SURE system is through the vote histories,” which they said Philadelphia, Allegheny, and other counties had still not completed — an admission the election was certified without ensuring the number of voters and votes matched in the SURE system. The election was certified on Nov. 24, 2020, and the Department of State’s statement came on Dec. 29, 2020.
• The SURE system was checked and downloaded weekly with updated voter histories from the general Election until all the counties uploaded their vote histories, which was not completed until February 2021. At this time there were still over 121,000 votes that did not have a corresponding voter in the SURE system.
• The statement by the Department of State “that the voting would reconcile, once the counties completed their SURE uploads, was incorrect,” according to Verity Vote. “When the final county finished uploading their voter histories and closed the election in SURE, it was February 1, 2021, which was the same day that [Secretary of State Kathy] Boockvar announced her resignation. At the time that Philadelphia closed the election in SURE, the voter histories showed that the county accepted at least 7,944 ballots that could not be associated with a registered voter.”
ARIZONA
• Arizona was called by a margin of 10,457 votes. • Maricopa County accepted 20,500 mail-in ballots after Election Day 2020, including 18,000 – more than the entire election margin – on Nov. 4 picked up from the U.S. Postal Service. By law, ballots must be received no later than 7 p.m. on Election Day, which was Nov. 3.
• “The 20,000 ballots recorded as incoming from the USPS on and after November 4 were of sufficient quantity to change the result of the 2020 General Election in Arizona,” according to Verity Vote.
• The findings were based on Maricopa County’s official Elections Department records, which were withheld from a public records request for nearly seven months. The records showed 18,000 mail-in ballots received on Nov. 4; 1,000 received on Nov. 5; and 1,500 received on Nov. 6.
• The 18,000 mail-in ballots received on Nov. 4 and subsequently counted represented a significant spike in ballots received, higher than every single day total since Oct. 29, 2020. The receipt of mail-in ballots had steadily declined from 14,500 ballots on Oct. 29 to 10,500 on Oct. 30; 6,000 on Oct. 31; 1,500 on Nov. 1; 1,000 on Nov. 2; and 2,500 on Nov. 3.
• In the 2020 General Election, 420,987 ballots failed signature verification standards, “thus the election was openly vulnerable to fraud,” according to an ongoing analysis conducted by We the People Arizona Alliance and presented to the state legislature.
MICHIGAN
• Michigan was called by 154,188 votes.
• A record 5,579,317 votes were cast and certified in Michigan in the 2020 General Election, the highest turnout in 60 years. To date, Michigan has never shown 5,579,317 voters listed for the 2020 Election in its Qualified Voter File, the state’s database for all voter registration records.
• As of December 2023, Michigan has 271,566 more votes than the number of voters listed in its Qualified Voter File for Nov. 3, 2020, more than one and a half times the Election margin.
• In data obtained from the Secretary of State’s office on nearly a monthly basis since the Election, the most voters ever recorded in the Qualified Voter File was 5,511,303 voters in April 2021. This means Michigan’s own election records showed 68,014 more votes than voters. However, the number of voters listed in the Qualified Voter File has been in flux ever since December 2020, and always short of the voters needed to reconcile the total votes cast. A complete list of voters from 2020 has never been provided.
• The number of voter IDs listed as voting in 2020 has steadily declined since February 2022. As of December 2023, there was a total of 5,307,751 voters listed as voting on Nov. 3, 2020 in the Qualified Voter File. Voter history files continue to be removed from the record, resulting in 271,566 less vote history records than necessary to reconcile the results.
There’s no doubt the simultaneous release of the Epstein documents was timed to minimize Trump’s bombshell summary. This tells us more Americans are believing the 2020 election was stolen and the perpetrators know it.
Be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong. Let all that you do be done in love.–1 Corinthians 16:13-14 (English Standard Version)
Like a cross to a vampire, traditional masculinity triggers the godless left. Why is this so?
So much of leftism attacks classic masculine traits such as courage, assertiveness, independence and leadership. Here’s why they must.
I believe it’s because masculinity is normal.
Oh it can’t be that… can it?
Yes it can, and it makes sense if you think about it.
Everything about the left is a parody and a counterfeit. Their policies and goals are steeped in chaos with the upending of what used to be accepted behaviors of the two sexes.
There is nothing chaotic about true masculinity. If anything ,masculinity produces order and calm which is kryptonite to the radical left.
Take a guess as to the masculinity poster boy that most triggers the godless left? That’s right: None other than President Donald Trump.
Let’s see… the left labels Trump as bombastic and braggadocious, yet he exhibits those masculine traits of courage, assertiveness, independence ,leadership and results in spades. Maybe that’s why the left and RINO’s on the right hate him?
Trump not only exemplifies those qualities, but he celebrates other men that project those qualities. Just look at any of his rallies. He always makes it a point to single out people in his audience that look like men’s men. He highlights and celebrates that as one alpha male to another which gets the left seething.
“Toxic masculinity this and toxic masculinity that!” they whine as if every male is a bully or misogynist. Now are there some jerks who exhibit those negative qualities?
Of course. But who stands against the those who bully others? That’s right, the masculine male.
The experts say toxic masculinity is harmful to nations because of misogyny, dominance and violence. Let’s examine these examples one by one.
The vast majority of masculine men are chivalrous to women because of their up-bringing. Notice you never ever hear the left discuss chivalry as a part of masculinity. Nope, all we hear associated with masculinity is sexism.
Dominance is also alien to true masculinity. These men do not obsess over bending people to their will , they’re too busy living their lives, taking care of their families and working their jobs. Only godless narcissists and sociopaths, walk around, contemplating how they can dominate society and culture. Remember, control is a reaction to fear.
Which brings us to violence…
For real toxic males, violence is a go-to, whether it’s raging, protecting fragile egos, dominating women or impressing peers with random assaults. We’re talking developmentally arrested individuals, lacking self-control. For them, violence is strength.
On the other hand, threats to family, friends innocents and personal safety are go-time for the traditional masculine man. These are males with self-control and patience…up to point. While these men are not prone to violence, they are not afraid to use it when needed.
God gave masculinity to men as tools to protect, build, carry on the species, fight, and if necessary, kill evil. Demonizing masculinity, in favor of radically feminizing culture, is literally withering the United States of America and Western Civilization.
This coordinated attack on masculinity is not to make us a better nation as the leftist mantra often claims. Instead, it is a strategy to destroy western nations like the United States, Canada and Great Britain by weakening its protectors: masculine men.
Want to know the biggest reason the left hates Trump or any other unapologetic masculine men? These guys whether in big ways or small inspire men to stand , resist and, if needed, fight.
Most importantly such men are heroic to young boys and teens. They provide an ideal for them in which to aspire.
True masculine guys don’t obsess over what people think about them. They form their opinions based on their core beliefs and principles.
The ever growing numbers of MAGA reflect a country of males thirsty for simple, plain-spoken truths outside of the gaslighting left. That’s sand in the gears of leftism which bullies people into staying silent and standing down out of guilt, shame or fear.
Men like Trump are dangerous to the left, so they are demonized as racists, misogynists, and homophobes. This is done so other guys will hesitate pushing back against the crazy leftist agenda.
Too many men want to be liked and accepted by everyone:pop culture, friends and even people they hardly know. They parrot mainstream thinking with their comments and observations and are mortified if they offend anyone. These are beta males.
To quote the legendary Brooklyn Dodgers Manager, Leo Durocher, “Nice guys finish last.” Or in this case , beta males aren’t even in the fight.
The need for traditional masculinity is a truth that may offend many in our angry , petulant and unserious culture. Since traditional masculinity triggers the godless left, more males should embrace this trait with alacrity.
