In a slap to the face to Christians, President Joe Biden called attention to Easter/ Resurrection Sunday 2024 as also National Transgender Visibility Day. Call this Biden’s Easter outrage.
And to pour more gasoline on the flame, the White House is banning children participating in the Egg Roll event from placing any religious symbolism or political speech on the eggs they submit. Translation: no crosses, no Jesus, no American flags and definitely, no MAGA.
Keep in mind, children of military families participate in the Easter Egg roll event. Will this affect turnout for Sunday? We’ll see .
Published reports give the impression this is the inaugural celebration, however, a Google search indicates Biden first proclaimed March 31 as this annual celebration in 2023. You read this here.
Biden called transgender persons part of the fabric of America and took the opportunity to savage Republicans.
“But extremists are proposing hundreds of hateful laws that target and terrify transgender kids and their families — silencing teachers; banning books; and even threatening parents, doctors, and nurses with prison for helping parents get care for their children,’ he said in a press release.
‘At the same time, an epidemic of violence against transgender women and girls, especially women and girls of color, continues to take too many lives. Let me be clear: All of these attacks are un-American and must end.
‘Today, we send a message to all transgender Americans: You are loved. You are heard. You are understood. You belong. You are America, and my entire Administration and I have your back.”‘
Did I mention Biden declares himself a devout Catholic?
If this trans visibility day was first proclaimed in 2023, why the trolling on the eve of Easter? Biden is doing this in a heated election year and in most polls, trailing President Donald Trump.
I’m thinking this is either the Biden Administration and the Dems believing they’re catering to a huge voting bloc, or they ‘re stoking outrage to divert Americans from something else .
Let’s see how this plays out. Thankfully, Easter will not fall on March 31 again for a decade.
As a Christian, what this thoroughly corrupt administration does elicits no more outrage on my part. I am at the point where nothing they do surprises me.
Biden’s Easter outrage does not change that Jesus is risen… He is risen indeed!
You know, when watching media coverage of Trump’s “bloodbath” comment, I couldn’t help thinking, wow! This is the joke that is journalism.
All the anchors–pancake makeup, well-coiffed hair, and melodramatic, delivery — all reporting the exact same narrative/ lie.
To recap, at a recent campaign rally, Trump warned of a bloodbath for the American auto industry if he is not re-elected to protect against China’s incursions into the EV market.
The fake news conveniently omitted the context of the auto industry in its initial coverage:
When the media discovered the public wasn’t falling for the schtick, it fell back to the old trope of “Tonight, Trump under fire for controversial comments..” ABC not only ran with this tact, but took the opportunity to work in the media’s J6 narrative for good measure. Watch:
Courtesy: ABC News
It seems the news outlets got the 4 am fax over the style of coverage of Trump. You know: the template that he’s the greatest danger to American democracy.
Remember what a danger this guy was? Trump rebuilt our military, made us energy independent, gave us a roaring economy, defended the unborn, built most of the border wall, kept us out of war, made inroads with North Korea, got us out of Afghanistan, brought manufacturing back to America, slapped the Chi-coms with import tariffs, removed us from the Paris Climate accords, and even took away the shame of saying Merry Christmas, just to name a few of his many accomplishments.
The press ignores all the good Trump did for the country just so they can continue to gaslight people into hating him. “Stop bad Orange Man!” is the prevailing mainstream mission.
Therefore, no questioning the timing of these court cases against Trump during an election year. Election interference? Nothing to see here.
Black Lives Matter and Antifa burned buildings and killed people during the summer of love, and the media called it peaceful protest. Americans protest the 2020 election in Washington D.C., and the media, along with the Uniparty, demonizes them as insurrectionists.
The fake news image is that of the proverbial trio of monkey’s seeing, speaking and hearing no evil when it comes to parroting the Democrat and corporate narrative.
A press that cannot maintain objectivity becomes, merely, a propaganda arm for tyranny. This is inevitable when the press are subsidiaries of major corporations.
Corporations exist to make their shareholders money, which involves lobbying government. Considering this reality, how can an independent press exist when it’s coverage is so influenced by the bottom line?
So what’s the solution? You’re seeing it in the alternative media. These are the real journalists serving the public and exposing the truth. These enterprising men and women are not beholden to corporate interests, only the people.
And that’s what has D.C. freaked out right now. With these purely independent entities, they can’t control the narrative.
Officials used to be able say any lie or distortion on camera, and it would be months or years before the truth came out. Now this debunking takes place in a matter of hours, thanks to citizen media.
I think citizen-media is a more a apt description than alternative media. Perhaps journalism is better served, and more effective when practiced by persons who are on the receiving end of government policy.
Can the mainstream media re-establish itself as an objective source of information? I don’t believe so. As long as the alphabet networks and the major publications are under the corporate umbrella, there is no possible way a journalist could practice total objectivity without risk of losing their job.
So this is the joke that is journalism. The punchline is more citizen reporters needed.
I read this on X this weekend and it’s funny because it’s true. Here’s your handy media translator guide to read between the lines of what’s reported by the propaganda press.
Handy Legacy Media Translator Guide
no evidence = there's a huge pile of evidence conspiracy theory = the stone cold truth baseless claims = legitimate concerns election denier = reasonably suspects election fraud election denier fringe = majority (62%) of all likely voters pic.twitter.com/VquFcZ8N1M
“No evidence” means there’s a huge pile of evidence. “Conspiracy theory” means the stone cold truth.
How about the old “baseless claims” line they always use against anyone questioning the 2020 election? This is anyone who reasonably suspects election fraud.
“Election deniers”? These are really people who reasonably suspect election fraud.
My favorite is the “election denier fringe.” This equals a majority of likely voters (62 percent).
That majority of 62 percent was the result of a May 2, 2023 poll asking the question “How likely is that cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 Presidential Election? That result was a new record high.
I would love to read an updated poll as things have gotten even worse in America.
Hello media…We’re on to your methods now.
Can you think of any examples of media translation? Please list in the comments section.
You’ve probably seen the fake news “bloodbath” attribution to President Trump as the latest threat to “democracy”. It’s a hoax.
During a speech to the Buckeye Values PAC Rally in Dayton, Ohio, Trump informed the capacity crowd of China’s plans to build massive EV plants in Mexico. Such an investment indicates the Chinese believe the US Government will force the existence of the EV market, despite the public reception of the vehicles, cooling. China’s dominance would destroy the U.S. EV market.
Here’s Trump’s comment:
Trump said it will be a bloodbath for the auto industry if he is not re-elected and is right. However, the media willfully lied about the context of Trump’s comment, twisting it into a threat against “democracy” if he doesn’t win in November.
Check out these hoax headlines: (Hat tip: The Conservative Treehouse)
And right on cue a “grieved” Nancy Pelosi:
Pelosi just told CNN that Trump might "exact a bloodbath" if he loses
Pelosi and the media think the American people are stupid. More people are coming out of their stupor and seeing this as the dirty, disgusting hoax that it is.
Truth and objectivity? What a laugh. This is going to backfire big time. The only truth is the media is fake news.
Intellectual Froglegs: “Orange Crush”, the latest installment from patriot Joe Dan Gorman. My only gripe about this site is I wish I could post these shows weekly. That’s how good they are.
This episode spotlights the irony that the worst RINO’s ( Republicans In Name Only) represent reds states. He also features an exclusive interview with Dr. Naomi Wolf.
In an historic, unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) smacks down Colorado’s attempt to remove President Donald Trump from the ballot due to the 14th Amendment. This 9-0 ruling effectively stops the efforts of other states to do the same.
Here’s the media reaction. First, from Fox:
CNN:
BBC:
and finally, NBC.
This is a major victory for President Trump and for America. Praise the Lord!
What is lawfare? Lawfare is a system of warfare using the legal system as weapons against an intended target.
The goal is simple: bring wave after wave of accusations, lawsuits and cases against the target, forcing them to devote time and finances to defend against the charges. And like every leftist tactic, they rig it in their favor.
First, lawfare prosecutors in blue states bring charges using some obscure law or rehashing previous cases from a new standpoint. Next, the propaganda-media manipulates public opinion with reports favoring the leftist prosecutors. The media narrative portrays the target in a negative light as if conviction is a foregone conclusion.
Finally , the battlefield is a jurisdiction with a biased jury pool or judge. Further stacking the deck, are judges not allowing evidence that casts doubt on the charges.
Does any of lawfare sound familiar? This is exactly what is happening to former President Donald Trump.
Courtesy: CNN
Why do you think all of these legal cases have descended on Trump on multiple fronts in an election year? The goal is to create in the pubic consciousness an image of this man embattled on all sides, so why waste your vote?
Last week, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron slapped Trump with a $355 million ruling in a case prosecuted by the partisan state Attorney General Letitia James. Trump also cannot do business in New York for three years under the ruling.
In January, a New York jury ordered Trump to pay $83 million for defaming E. Jean Carroll. The author and columnist accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in a Manhattan department store.
Of course the propaganda media reported the rulings with wall -to- wall coverage, branding it viewers’s minds that Trump is not above the law. However, they conveniently ignored or played down the problems with both trials, from Trump accusing Engoron of practically pronouncing him guilty from the beginning, and AG James getting elected on the promise she’s going to get Trump.
Not to mention, for someone on trial for fraud, no one who did business with Trump reported any fraud on his part. Engoron said Trump committed fraud by elevating the worth of his properties and assets: a familiar practice in business and loan transactions.
In the E. Jean Carroll trial, the judge refused to allow Trump attorneys to present evidence that would have cast doubt on her character and the validity of the suit. Remember, this woman is accusing Trump of sexual assault , yet she struggled to remember the exact year of when it happened.
Trump will appeal both cases. The only problem with the latest ruling is a New York state law prevents Trump from starting the appeal process until he pays the full amount which is actually $450 million with interest included. James promises to seize Trump properties if the bond is not posted in 30 days.
Let’s see, excessive fines and restrictions from doing business in New York… Eighth Amendment violation anyone?
Who cares? It’s lawfare. Shaky legal ground? That’s your truth. Implying guilt is all that matters. The brilliant Sundance at the Conservative Treehouse nails the definition of lawfare.
Like everything else about the left, lawfare is a tool to manipulate people’s thoughts, especially in an election year. This goes from location to the prosecutors chosen.
Take note that all these trials are taking place in major liberal strongholds where the jury pool or judge is anti-Trump such as New York, Washington D.C. and Fulton County, Georgia. Also is it a coincidence the prosecutors bringing these cases are predominantly black?
From clockwise: NY AG Letitia James, Special Counsel Jack Smith, Fulton County DA Fani Willis and Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg
With the emperor-is-wearing-no -clothes mentality of culture, we’re not to state the obvious. But before you yell at your computer, “That’s racist!” Keep in mind that your humble writer is an American who happens to be black.
Why are most of these prosecutors of the same race? Perhaps it is to lessen criticism? (i.e. If you question the prosecutors’ motivations or merits of the cases that makes you a racist?) Or maybe the inference is Trump must be a racist/extremist if these minority prosecutors are going after him? Remember, there are no coincidences with the left.
But what about Jack Smith in the J6 trials? He’s a white guy.
True.
However, Smith has a reputation of having a case overturned by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in a unanimous 8-0 decision. SCOTUS’ rebuke of Smith, with the liberal and conservative justices in agreement , testifies to the ruthless tactics this guy is known to use. In other words, he’s perfect for lawfare.
What is lawfare? No heroics or gallantry to see here folks; just the scorched- earth politics of personal destruction. That is lawfare.
Keep this in mind as we draw closer to Election Day in November.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) agreed on Friday to take up the Colorado case to remove President Donald Trump off the ballot due to the 14th Amendment. The court’s decision will have lasting ramifications in future efforts by the Democrats to keep the 45th President off of other state ballots.
The Colorado Supreme Court ‘removed’ Trump from the ballot in December for ‘inciting’ the January 6 ‘insurrection’ under the 14th Amendment. Critics of the Colorado court say the ruling is nothing more than election interference since Trump was never convicted for insurrection. More on that later.
Here is what insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment explicitly states:
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
As you can see from the language, the 14th Amendment applies to congresspersons, officers of the United States government, state assemblypersons, governors or judges. Nowhere is the President mentioned. Legal scholars say the 14th Amendment does not apply to the President because he is not an officer of the government and, in this case, was never found guilty of insurrection for the January 6 protest /riot.
If Trump was never found liable for inciting insurrection, then the legal basis from removing him from the ballot is questionable. You can’t penalize someone for an accusation without a conviction as Colorado, and later, Maine did. That makes a mockery of the law.
Arguments to SCOTUS will start on February 8 with a ruling following. Trump remains on both ballots pending litigation, in the meantime.
Please note the Colorado ruling was without teeth, playing both sides by allowing Trump back on the ballot as soon as he appealed to the Supreme Court. See this brilliant analysis by Sundance at the Conservative Treehouse.
“This time we got him!” The corporate media implied last week after the (latest) indictment of former President Donald Trump. Now days later it’s, “Oh my God, oh my God, Trump might actually win this thing!”
How do I know this?I have been reading between the lines of any commentary, editorial or story, post August 3 indictment.
Case in point, a recent editorial by the Miami Herald editorial board that has warns of the existentialist dangers of re-electing Trump. I encourage you to read the editorial in its entirety, but for the sake of brevity, I am going to focus a few especially choice excerpts.
For this column I will present the excerpt as written, followed by my satirical take of what the editorial board really means. In other words, reading between the lines.
First, the lede:
In 2016, voters went for Donald Trump, the showman, the bigot, the iconoclast, the sexist, the mean-spirited charmer quick with jab, joke or derisive nickname.
Now, given the mile-wide lead that the former president has in the race for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination, a majority of Republican voters seem ready to embrace Trump, the authoritarian.
Translation:
You voters ignored our polls that showed Donald Trump had no chance of defeating Hilary Clinton . We get it: You were swayed by Trump’s celebrity, which caused you to mindlessly embrace Trump’s racist assessment of who was entering the country illegally through the US/Mexico border.
Courtesy: C-SPAN
And how dare you not condemn Trump for insulting Senator John McCain’s valor as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. If that wasn’t bad enough, you ignored our breaking news of the Access Hollywood recording of Trump which should have buried him. You also turned a deaf ear to Trump’s disparaging comments against Rosie O’Donnell . (Who cares if she insulted him first? His response was like a bully.)
Finally you laughed at all of nicknames for opponents such as “Crooked Hillary,” “Lyin’ Ted “, “Little Marco” and “Crazy Nancy.”
Now Trump’s back with huge leads in the polls (after revelations that his campaign was spied upon, “Russiagate” was a perpetrated by the Hillary Clinton campaign, and he urged J6 protestors to leave peacefully). Reelecting this guy will lead to a power transfer back to the …people. That would be devastating for this country.
Trump and his campaign have been crystal clear: Should he regain the White House, he will consolidate every last bit of power he can into his own hands. The three equal branches of government will not be equal any more. The former president plans a sweeping makeover of the presidency and the constitutional foundations that actually make America great.
“What we’re trying to do is identify the pockets of independence(emphasis mine),” Russell T. Vought, one of Trump’s policy advisers told that New York Times, “and seize them.”
Translation:
Our side has been working to gather all the power into our hands, we naturally expect Trump will do the same.
And can you believe the gall of demanding a transparent Department of Justice and attorney general? Those pockets of independence should be outside the purview of the Executive Branch. (skip to 2:20 listen to 4:06)
Trump promises to wrest control from the Justice Department and order a criminal investigation into his predecessor, Joe Biden, an abuse of power that would top the Nixon White House and Watergate. Trump also says he will order the now-independent Justice Department to investigate charging decisions by local prosecutors, superseding constitutional separation of federal and local authorities.
You mean that same Department of Justice that “President” Biden has weaponized against his opponent President Trump and tried to give Hunter Biden a slap on the wrist?
Translation:
Trump will curb the current weaponization of the DOJ against the enemies of the Uniparty and instead have it go after criminals. (Wait…what?)
But Trump is promising something else: He will continue to reject our constitutional order and replace it with one-man rule, where he is the authority over laws and how they apply.
Translation:
Trump will… reject “our constitutional order” means he will govern not according to our modern interpretation of subverting the Constitution, but as the Founders intended. “One-man rule” is our way of saying dictator ( as we use racist, sexist or homophobe) to frighten people so they don’t hear the message of our enemies. The truth is we’re not giving up our authority over laws and how they apply.
He’ll undermine Americans’ ability to govern themselves. And he’ll create more chaos, because it serves him. We saw that, unforgettably, on Jan. 6, 2021, when he worked up supporters at his rally until they stormed the U.S. Capitol to block Biden’s victory from being certified.
Translation:
We’re in the process of undermining Americans’ ability to govern themselves. What do think the Covid mask and vaccine mandates were about? The same goes for our efforts to criminalize parents efforts to intervene when their kid wants to become the opposite sex? (Excuse us… gender designation at birth, not sex) The last thing we need is Trump screwing that up with the Founders’ belief about self -governance.
When Trump called for people to protest the election results on January 6, the numbers scared the hell out of us. Sure , the protestors didn’t burn down structures , vandalize police cars and beat up innocent people. That’s the difference between peaceful protest of BLM and Antifa and the chaos of Trump white supremacists.
Just because we called Trump’s 2016 election illegitimate, due to Russian interference, doesn’t give his racist , hayseed followers the right to do the same . So his commanding lead on November 3, 2020 evaporated over night after key states stopped the vote count. The nerve!
And now for my favorite paragraph, the conclusion;
Americans already have endured an unsuccessful coup. To prevent one that succeeds, more of us must pay attention, learn from history and act like the true Americans we can be.
Translation:
So far, most Americans reject Trump’s claim of a stolen election (although that number is shrinking). To make sure he doesn’t succeed, more of you must watch and gather information only from our news, learn from our version of history and act like the real Americans we want you to be (compliant, passive and unquestioning).
______________________________________________
And so ends our first exercise in reading between the lines. I tried to take a humorous approach. Humor works when it’s based on truth.
Here we go again. The latest effort to separate former President Donald Trump from his base.
Courtesy: ABC News
Another week, another indictment of a man already exonerated in two impeachments. Thursday , special counsel Jack Smith charged President Trump with four counts of conspiracy regarding the January 6 aftermath of the 2020 Presidential election.
Trump recently messaged on Truth Social he faces over 561 years in prison if convicted of this and other indictments brought by Democrats.
Yeah…561 years!
Are you sensing a little desperation here folks on the part of Joe Biden Administration? Specifically, the Department of Justice of “President” Biden whom congressional investigations are revealing may be the most corrupt man ever to hold the office?
And isn’t funny that whenever bombshell news is about to break about the latest allegation of Biden corruption, a Trump indictment happens? Hat tip to Captain Chaos who commented at the Gateway Pundit with this (verifiable) timeline:
“This is very sad day for America,” President Trump remarked after the hearing, “When you look at what’s happening this is a persecution of a political opponent. This was never supposed to happen in America. This is the persecution of the person that’s leading by very, very substantial numbers in the Republican primary and leading Biden by a lot. So if you can’t beat ’em, you persecute them or you prosecute ’em, we can’t let this happen in America.”
Those astronomical poll numbers are precisely why we are seeing all these indictments over two years after J6 and over a year from the the 2024 Presidential Election. Apparently, the Democrats and the deep state believe that the plethora of criminal charges against Trump will gradually separate him from his base.
So far, every indictment has led to an uptick in Trump’s poll numbers. I suspect polling in the aftermath of this recent indictment will show the same.
Will these indictments also provide the GOP/ RNC with the excuse to remove Trump from the ballot in certain states? ? It’s remotely possible, but I believe the fallout would mortally damage the Republican Party .
Plus, the Constitution says nothing about an indictment or conviction precluding anyone from running for presidential office. Even CNN confirmed this.
Still, the breathless news reports of Trump taken into custody and fingerprinted, (and the hopes of an eventual mugshot) are still sickening and depressing. And that is precisely how these persecutors want Trump supporters to feel. They want us sad and demoralized with the hope we will eventually move on to a safer and softer candidate.
So far, like a Wile E. Coyote ACME bomb , these efforts have blown up in the face of the Uniparty/deep state. Which begs the question , Are we witnessing insanity (doing the same thing over and expecting a different result) on the part of Trump’s enemies? Maybe, maybe not.
The problem is their strategy to tar and feather Trump’s reputation are awakening more and more people to the reality of a corrupt two-tiered justice system, instead of separating Trump from his base.
So for now, stay strong, God’s justice will prevail. May we ask God not only for peace and protection over President Trump, but also that his persecutors would know the love of Jesus Christ in their hearts. Maybe we can separate some of these lost souls from darkness of their hatred.
